Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
One more measly loss and they’d have been third last.
I wasn’t sure which way the tie breakers fell.Not even a loss, one less point would have done it.
Regulation wins would be the first tie-breaker, Flames and Rangers have us beat there.I wasn’t sure which way the tie breakers fell.
That Rangers game was a real sickener. Basically a 4 point swing there.
There are only 2 players in NHL history with 50 or more playoff games that have a higher playoff ppg than McDavid or Draisaitl. You might have heard of them: Gretzky & Lemieux. That is quite a yardstick you have there. And they couldn't beat the Florida Panthers either.I'm sorry but both things can be true. None of them got close to McDavid or Draisaitl in terms of playoff production. The Oilers had Stu freaking Skinner as their goalie and went to two cup finals. I'm sorry but we all know how much water you carry for these guys. Not one of them, one time, took the team on their backs and carried the team forward. I agree goaltending has been an Achilles heel and management deserves blame but to say the core 4 don't have much blame in this truly has me at a loss for words to describe how selective that analysis is.
Who would do the exit interviews? In my head, I thought management would check in with each player to discuss each player's specific scenario. We have no management (or capable coach).
The issue isn't the Florida Panthers over the last 10 years and you know that. The point I'm making is not one of these players carried the team on their back throughout 10 years to win a round or two, and I think the point still stands. It's one thing to get to the finals and a whole other thing to win two rounds in 10 years. You'd think with that much talent to go around someone would rise up like Mikita, but nobody did.There are only 2 players in NHL history with 50 or more playoff games that have a higher playoff ppg than McDavid or Draisaitl. You might have heard of them: Gretzky & Lemieux. That is quite a yardstick you have there. And they couldn't beat the Florida Panthers either.
The first time I recall the term shadow in hockey was against Bobby Hull. 15 years, mostly in a 6 team league and on a good team with a number of Hall of Famers. When they won their one and only cup, Makita led in goal scoring and Pilote in points. One of the greatest of his era arguably never "put his team entirely on his back" to a Cup - to win 2 rounds - though he had great playoff stats.
Jon Cooper remarked about the Leafs (paraphrased) "you put your best players on their core 4 to negate them and then let our bottom 6 beat their inferior bottom 6". He applied that against most opponents because he felt he had the best 3rd line in hockey (very roughly stated)
About 1/3 of Conn Smythe winners are goalies. Very difficult to get very far in the playoffs without a good goalie. Stats are probably not the best reference there as Vasilevskiy and Hellebuyck have the worst playoff GAA since 2022-23 among goalies who played 8+ playoff games.
![]()
Maple Leafs interviewing Mats Sundin for hockey department job
Sportsnet's Elliotte Friedman has learned that ownership will meet with the Maple Leafs' all-time leading scorer, Mats Sundin, as soon as Friday about a role in the hockey department.www.sportsnet.ca
Please let this happen.***SWOONS***
They are big boys and if you fire him now, you are taking that choice away from the new guy.The problem is expecting the new GM and/or POHO to make one of their first moves firing him (because anyone competent is firing him). Take that burden away from prospective hires. Don't make their first major move be a negative one.
I think for me it's about doings things in the proper order and having the right person making the decision. Pelley hires the President, President hires a GM, GM hires a coach. It also goes that way for firings. I don't think Pelley should ever really get a say in who the coach of the team is (even if he happens to be right), and that's who would really be making that decision if Berube was fired before a permanent GM is in place.The problem is expecting the new GM and/or POHO to make one of their first moves firing him (because anyone competent is firing him). Take that burden away from prospective hires. Don't make their first major move be a negative one.
The thing for me is what does Bérubé bring that should make anyone think he's fit to right the ship.
The possession numbers are atrocious. The scoring chances are wildly against us. Actual goal scoring relative to goals against is poor. We aren't a physical team. We aren't a fast team. We aren't a gritty defensive team.
So the play style is just poor start to finish. So maybe it's his ability to make players accountable.
When was the last time he took Nylander to task for his lackluster play. When did Domi face consequences for atrocious play. When was Rielly help accountable for constant fundamental defensive mistakes. Chief was great at giving Quillan the bench treatment for a mistake. He didn't hold anyone accountable.
Is there harm in firing him in July instead...not technically, but by not firing him, the organization is telling me there is a chance that they won't. I'm not sticking around for the 2027 Leafs if Bérubé is the coach. It will be an easy decision for me to spend my money on something other than Leafs tickets if the organization is so blatantly cheap in bringing him back.
Old school scouting should tell you Berube is a bad fit. Analytics absolutely say he's a bad fit. Making decisions that fly in the face of reality is the sign of an organization that either doesn't know what it is doing or one that acting like a mid tier franchise and not the most profitable one in the league.
I think for me it's about doings things in the proper order and having the right person making the decision. Pelley hires the President, President hires a GM, GM hires a coach. It also goes that way for firings. I don't think Pelley should ever really get a say in who the coach of the team is (even if he happens to be right), and that's who would really be making that decision if Berube was fired before a permanent GM is in place.
To me the thing is, as a coach you might have your “style” or systems or way of playing.The thing for me is what does Bérubé bring that should make anyone think he's fit to right the ship.
The possession numbers are atrocious. The scoring chances are wildly against us. Actual goal scoring relative to goals against is poor. We aren't a physical team. We aren't a fast team. We aren't a gritty defensive team.
So the play style is just poor start to finish. So maybe it's his ability to make players accountable.
When was the last time he took Nylander to task for his lackluster play. When did Domi face consequences for atrocious play. When was Rielly help accountable for constant fundamental defensive mistakes. Chief was great at giving Quillan the bench treatment for a mistake. He didn't hold anyone accountable.
Is there harm in firing him in July instead...not technically, but by not firing him, the organization is telling me there is a chance that they won't. I'm not sticking around for the 2027 Leafs if Bérubé is the coach. It will be an easy decision for me to spend my money on something other than Leafs tickets if the organization is so blatantly cheap in bringing him back.
Old school scouting should tell you Berube is a bad fit. Analytics absolutely say he's a bad fit. Making decisions that fly in the face of reality is the sign of an organization that either doesn't know what it is doing or one that acting like a mid tier franchise and not the most profitable one in the league.