Author Topic: Leafs @ Habs - Mar. 1st, 7:00pm - CBC, TSN 1050  (Read 14777 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline lamajama

  • Veteran
  • ****
  • Posts: 3200
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
Re: Leafs @ Habs - Mar. 1st, 7:00pm - CBC, TSN 1050
« Reply #255 on: March 02, 2014, 10:48:12 AM »
The Leafs may make the playoffs but will go NOWHERE until they fix the darn PK. They can't fix their wont to take stupid penalties so.....
I didn't say it was your fault, I said I was blaming you.

Offline TML fan

  • Veteran
  • ****
  • Posts: 3947
    • View Profile
Re: Leafs @ Habs - Mar. 1st, 7:00pm - CBC, TSN 1050
« Reply #256 on: March 02, 2014, 10:52:20 AM »
Just don't call Gleason and I doubt there would have even been an OT.

TMLfans.ca

Re: Leafs @ Habs - Mar. 1st, 7:00pm - CBC, TSN 1050
« Reply #256 on: March 02, 2014, 10:52:20 AM »

Offline Nik Bethune

  • Sittler Status
  • ******
  • Posts: 26923
  • All posts approved by CCP
    • View Profile
Re: Leafs @ Habs - Mar. 1st, 7:00pm - CBC, TSN 1050
« Reply #257 on: March 02, 2014, 01:22:08 PM »
]My point is that if they don't call the hook in OT that they called in the first then there's enough discretion available not to call Bernier there especially when the Habs already had a four on three in the OT.

There really isn't. Like the over the glass DOG it's a pretty simple yes or no rule. Flip teams in this situation and I don't think anyone here would be advocating that the Refs should stop calling blatant penalties because the Leafs had already had a PP.
Nothing can have value without being an object of utility
-Karl Marx

Offline Stickytape

  • Veteran
  • ****
  • Posts: 1212
    • View Profile
Re: Leafs @ Habs - Mar. 1st, 7:00pm - CBC, TSN 1050
« Reply #258 on: March 02, 2014, 05:10:16 PM »
]My point is that if they don't call the hook in OT that they called in the first then there's enough discretion available not to call Bernier there especially when the Habs already had a four on three in the OT.

There really isn't. Like the over the glass DOG it's a pretty simple yes or no rule. Flip teams in this situation and I don't think anyone here would be advocating that the Refs should stop calling blatant penalties because the Leafs had already had a PP.

I agree.  I think there was cause for the refs to be lenient with Bernier, but he left them no opportunity.  It was a clear-cut penalty.

Offline Zee

  • Sittler Status
  • ******
  • Posts: 12706
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
Re: Leafs @ Habs - Mar. 1st, 7:00pm - CBC, TSN 1050
« Reply #259 on: March 02, 2014, 07:09:18 PM »
]My point is that if they don't call the hook in OT that they called in the first then there's enough discretion available not to call Bernier there especially when the Habs already had a four on three in the OT.

There really isn't. Like the over the glass DOG it's a pretty simple yes or no rule. Flip teams in this situation and I don't think anyone here would be advocating that the Refs should stop calling blatant penalties because the Leafs had already had a PP.

I agree.  I think there was cause for the refs to be lenient with Bernier, but he left them no opportunity.  It was a clear-cut penalty.

You never really see it called especially with an opposing player so close.  Never seen it in OT either.  Oh well.

Offline Potvin29

  • Sittler Status
  • ******
  • Posts: 14579
  • Gender: Male
  • Auston 20:16
    • View Profile
Re: Leafs @ Habs - Mar. 1st, 7:00pm - CBC, TSN 1050
« Reply #260 on: March 02, 2014, 07:12:23 PM »
]My point is that if they don't call the hook in OT that they called in the first then there's enough discretion available not to call Bernier there especially when the Habs already had a four on three in the OT.

There really isn't. Like the over the glass DOG it's a pretty simple yes or no rule. Flip teams in this situation and I don't think anyone here would be advocating that the Refs should stop calling blatant penalties because the Leafs had already had a PP.

I agree.  I think there was cause for the refs to be lenient with Bernier, but he left them no opportunity.  It was a clear-cut penalty.

You never really see it called especially with an opposing player so close.  Never seen it in OT either.  Oh well.

I can't even remember the last time a play like that happened, so that's probably why you don't see it called.  More often you see the puck come down the ice and the goalie cover it a step or two outside of the crease, and not in a 'race for the puck' scenario like this one was.