TJ Brodie to TOR
— Elliotte Friedman (@FriedgeHNIC) October 9, 2020
TJ Brodie, signed by TOR, is a top four left-handed two way defenceman who plays the right side and, yes, is good defensively. #LeafsForever pic.twitter.com/THzJJy9SKb
— JFresh (@JFreshHockey) October 9, 2020
Brodie getting a 4-year deal worth $20 million, which would presumably take the Leafs out of the Pietrangelo sweepstakes. #VegasBorn https://t.co/OmpFIro0Uy
— Jesse Granger (@JesseGranger_) October 9, 2020
From @EvolvingHockey, the left is 2018-19 Tyson Barrie, the right is 2019-20 TJ Brodie. pic.twitter.com/Hnh6uIaZ6i
— JFresh (@JFreshHockey) October 9, 2020
Dermott to the highest bidder seems far more likely now.If they can sign him, they will. Sandin is still waiver exempt and right now I think Dermott is better then Sandin.
That lineup is 294,800 under the cap. Dermott and Mikheyev are still unsigned. You could probably trade Johnsson (3.4M) and have 3.7M to get those two signed and then depending on left-overs have enough to sign about a million dollar player but the Leafs would be dressing a lineup with no healthy scratches that way. You could also trade Dermott at this point because he's going to get exposed in the expansion draft next year.
Nobody said Dubas was done. Acquiring Weegar would have to be via a trade so it's still possible. We'll see but I don't think Dubas is done yet.
I'd have preferred Weegar but I'm guessing the asset cost there would have been high. Not a bad alternative. Can live with the term/number.
I don't know much about Brodie, but sounds like he's basically what we need. I think the idea of requiring all LD/RD is a bit dumb considering it isn't 50/50 split handedness in the league. I wonder if Kerfoot gets dealt and we pick up someone like Jankowski or someone else going heavier on defense that's cheaper in the 3C role.Jankowski is off the board I believe.
The Leafs D group is still not very good
— EvolvingWild (@EvolvingWild) October 9, 2020
Well, I was totally wrong... don’t go look at our GAR/xGAR league tables and see that their defensemen are both 5th overall in total GAR & xGAR over the past 2 seasons.
— EvolvingWild (@EvolvingWild) October 9, 2020
Nobody said Dubas was done. Acquiring Weegar would have to be via a trade so it's still possible. We'll see but I don't think Dubas is done yet.
I'd have preferred Weegar but I'm guessing the asset cost there would have been high. Not a bad alternative. Can live with the term/number.I don't know much about Brodie, but sounds like he's basically what we need. I think the idea of requiring all LD/RD is a bit dumb considering it isn't 50/50 split handedness in the league. I wonder if Kerfoot gets dealt and we pick up someone like Jankowski or someone else going heavier on defense that's cheaper in the 3C role.Jankowski is off the board I believe.
Well I feel better now lol.The Leafs D group is still not very good
— EvolvingWild (@EvolvingWild) October 9, 2020Well, I was totally wrong... don’t go look at our GAR/xGAR league tables and see that their defensemen are both 5th overall in total GAR & xGAR over the past 2 seasons.
— EvolvingWild (@EvolvingWild) October 9, 2020
The Leafs D is... evolving.
Are we sad Nick Cousins went for $1.5m to the Preds?
Are we sad Nick Cousins went for $1.5m to the Preds?
I am a bit sad
Are we sad Nick Cousins went for $1.5m to the Preds?
I am a bit sad
Meh... he has, stuff, surrounding him.
Johnsson - Matthews - Marner
Hyman - Tavares - Nylander
Engvall - Kerfoot - Simmonds
Robertson - Spezza - <<?>>
<<?>>
Rielly - Brodie
Muzzin - Holl
Sandin - Lehtonen
<<?>>
Andersen
Campbell
That lineup is 294,800 under the cap. Dermott and Mikheyev are still unsigned. You could probably trade Johnsson (3.4M) and have 3.7M to get those two signed and then depending on left-overs have enough to sign about a million dollar player but the Leafs would be dressing a lineup with no healthy scratches that way. You could also trade Dermott at this point because he's going to get exposed in the expansion draft next year.
Was he the one who wouldn?t waive his no trade to come to the leafs?
Someone brought up an old Mirtle tweet that said Leafs were on Brodie's no trade list. So that is kind of weirdWas he the one who wouldn?t waive his no trade to come to the leafs?
I think it was the other way around. Kadri declined to waive to go to Calgary
Nobody said Dubas was done. Acquiring Weegar would have to be via a trade so it's still possible. We'll see but I don't think Dubas is done yet.
I'd have preferred Weegar but I'm guessing the asset cost there would have been high. Not a bad alternative. Can live with the term/number.I don't know much about Brodie, but sounds like he's basically what we need. I think the idea of requiring all LD/RD is a bit dumb considering it isn't 50/50 split handedness in the league. I wonder if Kerfoot gets dealt and we pick up someone like Jankowski or someone else going heavier on defense that's cheaper in the 3C role.Jankowski is off the board I believe.
Yes, Jankowski went to the Penguins.
Someone brought up an old Mirtle tweet that said Leafs were on Brodie's no trade list. So that is kind of weirdWas he the one who wouldn?t waive his no trade to come to the leafs?
I think it was the other way around. Kadri declined to waive to go to Calgary
Nobody said Dubas was done. Acquiring Weegar would have to be via a trade so it's still possible. We'll see but I don't think Dubas is done yet.
I'd have preferred Weegar but I'm guessing the asset cost there would have been high. Not a bad alternative. Can live with the term/number.I don't know much about Brodie, but sounds like he's basically what we need. I think the idea of requiring all LD/RD is a bit dumb considering it isn't 50/50 split handedness in the league. I wonder if Kerfoot gets dealt and we pick up someone like Jankowski or someone else going heavier on defense that's cheaper in the 3C role.Jankowski is off the board I believe.
Yes, Jankowski went to the Penguins.
Didn't even see that! Larsson?
Finally, a defenseman with the positives and negatives on the correct side of the ice ;DTJ Brodie (4x5m with Toronto) is a very good defensive defender with a decent shot. pic.twitter.com/SoLBuR6aDi
— Micah Blake McCurdy (@IneffectiveMath) October 9, 2020
NMC in year 1, partial NTC in 2-4.
NMC in year 1, partial NTC in 2-4.
Muzzin and Brodie are Seattle-proof.
To clarify: T.J. Brodie does not have to be protected in the Seattle expansion draft by the #leafs.
— Chris Johnston (@reporterchris) October 10, 2020
Just like Jake Muzzin, he has a no-movement clause for next season which then converts to a limited no-trade clause.
NMC in year 1, partial NTC in 2-4.
Muzzin and Brodie are Seattle-proof.To clarify: T.J. Brodie does not have to be protected in the Seattle expansion draft by the #leafs.
— Chris Johnston (@reporterchris) October 10, 2020
Just like Jake Muzzin, he has a no-movement clause for next season which then converts to a limited no-trade clause.
Kyle Dubas is confident Maple Leafs can "dance" around cap to be compliant for opening night without trading away a significant piece. Tips cap to Brandon Pridham.
— luke fox (@lukefoxjukebox) October 10, 2020
NMC in year 1, partial NTC in 2-4.
Muzzin and Brodie are Seattle-proof.To clarify: T.J. Brodie does not have to be protected in the Seattle expansion draft by the #leafs.
— Chris Johnston (@reporterchris) October 10, 2020
Just like Jake Muzzin, he has a no-movement clause for next season which then converts to a limited no-trade clause.
K I thought this meant we had to have them on our protection list and we weren?t allowed to expose them.
But now are we saying they don?t count?
Interesting:Kyle Dubas is confident Maple Leafs can "dance" around cap to be compliant for opening night without trading away a significant piece. Tips cap to Brandon Pridham.
— luke fox (@lukefoxjukebox) October 10, 2020
Interesting:Kyle Dubas is confident Maple Leafs can "dance" around cap to be compliant for opening night without trading away a significant piece. Tips cap to Brandon Pridham.
— luke fox (@lukefoxjukebox) October 10, 2020
Doesn't mean they aren't trading anybody else in the bottom 6 ;)
Interesting:Kyle Dubas is confident Maple Leafs can "dance" around cap to be compliant for opening night without trading away a significant piece. Tips cap to Brandon Pridham.
— luke fox (@lukefoxjukebox) October 10, 2020
Doesn't mean they aren't trading anybody else in the bottom 6 ;)
Key word significant piece. Meaning the big 4.Interesting:Kyle Dubas is confident Maple Leafs can "dance" around cap to be compliant for opening night without trading away a significant piece. Tips cap to Brandon Pridham.
— luke fox (@lukefoxjukebox) October 10, 2020
Doesn't mean they aren't trading anybody else in the bottom 6 ;)
Dubas: "Brandon [Pridham] has carved out a number of ways that we can dance as it pertains to being compliant on opening day without having to necessarily move somebody that people would normally look at & say, 'Well, they're going to have to move this player at this salary'"
— Mark Masters (@markhmasters) October 10, 2020
Actual quote:Dubas: "Brandon [Pridham] has carved out a number of ways that we can dance as it pertains to being compliant on opening day without having to necessarily move somebody that people would normally look at & say, 'Well, they're going to have to move this player at this salary'"
— Mark Masters (@markhmasters) October 10, 2020
Think we should sign this kid? Just did 😏 pic.twitter.com/0jQOHGtepV
— Toronto Maple Leafs (@MapleLeafs) October 10, 2020
That was cool. Man those old Leafs...Think we should sign this kid? Just did 😏 pic.twitter.com/0jQOHGtepV
— Toronto Maple Leafs (@MapleLeafs) October 10, 2020
TJ Brodie contract breakdown with Leafs:
— Pierre LeBrun (@PierreVLeBrun) October 10, 2020
2.5
5.0
5.0
7.5
All base salary no signing bonus
In typical Dubas fashion, we overpay on another contract to put further strain on cap. Don't get me wrong, Brodie is a good defencemen, but not a 5 million guy in todays current cap crunch market. Shattenkirk, who possesses what I perceive to be a more sought after skillset by most teams, signed for 3.9 x 3 to go to a crap team.
In typical Dubas fashion, we overpay on another contract to put further strain on cap. Don't get me wrong, Brodie is a good defencemen, but not a 5 million guy in todays current cap crunch market. Shattenkirk, who possesses what I perceive to be a more sought after skillset by most teams, signed for 3.9 x 3 to go to a crap team.
TJ Brodie on ...
— Mark Masters (@markhmasters) October 10, 2020
* Coming full circle with Leafs
* Toronto pursuing him for more than a year
* What stands out about Rielly & Muzzin
* Adapting to the Eastern Conference
Here's the full Zoom session with the 30-year-old from Chatham, Ont. 👇https://t.co/fO3Z4y7qWs
Shattenkirk is basically Barrie. Why would we do that again?In typical Dubas fashion, we overpay on another contract to put further strain on cap. Don't get me wrong, Brodie is a good defencemen, but not a 5 million guy in todays current cap crunch market. Shattenkirk, who possesses what I perceive to be a more sought after skillset by most teams, signed for 3.9 x 3 to go to a crap team.
I'm not sure there's a team in the league that would take Shattenkirk over Brodie right now.
Can you describe that skill set and what makes it more sought after than what Brodie's?
Shattenkirk is basically Barrie. Why would we do that again?In typical Dubas fashion, we overpay on another contract to put further strain on cap. Don't get me wrong, Brodie is a good defencemen, but not a 5 million guy in todays current cap crunch market. Shattenkirk, who possesses what I perceive to be a more sought after skillset by most teams, signed for 3.9 x 3 to go to a crap team.
I'm not sure there's a team in the league that would take Shattenkirk over Brodie right now.
Quote
Can you describe that skill set and what makes it more sought after than what Brodie's?
A little more dangerous offensively, can QB a powerplay.
Yeah by no means was I saying I would want Shattenkirk over Brodie based on the makeup of this defence, just saying the number seems high.
Is TJ Brodie?s name Terry Jerry?
Shattenkirk is basically Barrie. Why would we do that again?In typical Dubas fashion, we overpay on another contract to put further strain on cap. Don't get me wrong, Brodie is a good defencemen, but not a 5 million guy in todays current cap crunch market. Shattenkirk, who possesses what I perceive to be a more sought after skillset by most teams, signed for 3.9 x 3 to go to a crap team.
I'm not sure there's a team in the league that would take Shattenkirk over Brodie right now.
Yeah by no means was I saying I would want Shattenkirk over Brodie based on the makeup of this defence, just saying the number seems high.
Is TJ Brodie?s name Terry Jerry?I thought it was Trodie Jodie?
Tanev for 4.5 over 4 to Calgary kind of undercuts the notion that this was an overpay.That seems like a pretty risky move.
We know there was interest in Brodie last summer. What is it that you like about this player now for well over a year?
Dubas: The things that we liked: The fact that he has played with an elite partner in Mark Giordano for a number of years now, and they?ve had a lot of success as a pair. As we have tried to find a partner and/or Jake Muzzin now that can complement them and boost the results of our team, TJ ? the style and the way that he plays and operates on the ice, with his skill set defensively and with the puck ? just always seemed to fit what we were looking for. That is why he has been a target of ours and why we are happy to have him here.
As a left shot that plays the right side, do sometimes we on the outside make too big of a deal of what way a guy curves his stick? [editor's note: why did the question have to sound so sexual]
Dubas: Trust me, there are people on the inside who make a big deal out of it as well. It is not just confined to media or fans. We talk about it a lot in here as well.
I think the thing with TJ is that he has done it for so long going back to the OHL. It is the side he prefers. He is able to play on both sides, but he has predominately played the right. There are some guys who can?t do it ? it?s just the way they receive the puck and the ability to shift it across their bodies and make plays. It takes an extra second or half a second. It is not for everybody. Some players struggle to do it, but he has shown the capacity to do it and the intelligence to do it. He has done it for such a long time now that it is not even really in dispute. It is what makes the most sense for us.
To clarify: T.J. Brodie does not have to be protected in the Seattle expansion draft by the #leafs.
— Chris Johnston (@reporterchris) October 10, 2020
Just like Jake Muzzin, he has a no-movement clause for next season which then converts to a limited no-trade clause.
K I thought this meant we had to have them on our protection list and we weren?t allowed to expose them.
But now are we saying they don?t count?
I think they have to have an NMC for 2021-22, Seattle's first season, to require protection.
Okay I need a clarification here (cc: Deebo, busta, et al.), because Johnston saying the Leafs "don't have to protect Brodie" can be interpreted two ways.
If we want to keep Muzzin and Brodie past the expansion, we can opt to protect them, right? But because their contracts are NTCs for the Seattle expansion season, we could leave them exposed if the fit wasn't right.
So if we land Weegar to go along with Reilly, Muzzin, Brodie, that's 4 D we'd like to keep and we'd have to go 8-1 and lose Dermott.
Okay I need a clarification here (cc: Deebo, busta, et al.), because Johnston saying the Leafs "don't have to protect Brodie" can be interpreted two ways.
If we want to keep Muzzin and Brodie past the expansion, we can opt to protect them, right? But because their contracts are NTCs for the Seattle expansion season, we could leave them exposed if the fit wasn't right.
So if we land Weegar to go along with Reilly, Muzzin, Brodie, that's 4 D we'd like to keep and we'd have to go 8-1 and lose Dermott.
When Johnston says "don't have to", I'm pretty sure he just means they aren't forced to.
They do have to if they prevent Seattle from taking them.
Yeah, if they go 8+1, its those 4D that you mention, + the top 4 forwards.
Lose one of whoever is left here out of Johnsson, Kerfoot and Dermott.
Okay I need a clarification here (cc: Deebo, busta, et al.), because Johnston saying the Leafs "don't have to protect Brodie" can be interpreted two ways.
If we want to keep Muzzin and Brodie past the expansion, we can opt to protect them, right? But because their contracts are NTCs for the Seattle expansion season, we could leave them exposed if the fit wasn't right.
So if we land Weegar to go along with Reilly, Muzzin, Brodie, that's 4 D we'd like to keep and we'd have to go 8-1 and lose Dermott.
When Johnston says "don't have to", I'm pretty sure he just means they aren't forced to.
They do have to if they prevent Seattle from taking them.
Yeah, if they go 8+1, its those 4D that you mention, + the top 4 forwards.
Lose one of whoever is left here out of Johnsson, Kerfoot and Dermott.
Thanks... because it really read like, oh they're basically exempt from the draft.
Our expansion draft used to be so straightforward last year. It's nice having too many good players.
Rielly - BrodieNothing wrong leaving Liljegren on the Marlies. He's only 21 and if Lehtonen is as good as they say, they may not be able to afford him in 21/22
Muzzin - Holl
Sandin - Lehtonen
This is so immensely better than having Barrie and Ceci occupying two of these spaces.
Anybody think Liljegren can bust his way into the lineup? I'd hate to see him get lost in the shuffle until he's had more of a chance.
Rielly - BrodieNothing wrong leaving Liljegren on the Marlies. He's only 21 and if Lehtonen is as good as they say, they may not be able to afford him in 21/22
Muzzin - Holl
Sandin - Lehtonen
This is so immensely better than having Barrie and Ceci occupying two of these spaces.
Anybody think Liljegren can bust his way into the lineup? I'd hate to see him get lost in the shuffle until he's had more of a chance.
I think he'll be on the team eventually. I like him.Rielly - BrodieNothing wrong leaving Liljegren on the Marlies. He's only 21 and if Lehtonen is as good as they say, they may not be able to afford him in 21/22
Muzzin - Holl
Sandin - Lehtonen
This is so immensely better than having Barrie and Ceci occupying two of these spaces.
Anybody think Liljegren can bust his way into the lineup? I'd hate to see him get lost in the shuffle until he's had more of a chance.
True all, and I understand that they may need him there for cap savings alone, especially at the start of the season as part of Pridham's Two-Step. But he is, potentially, the RHD we need. Or a RHD we need, anyway.
So I decided to check out another Leafs forum to see what they thought of Brodie, FA, and the draft.....and I just want to say how glad I am to be here and how much I love you guys... :-*Editor In Leaf by chance? AKA The Dubas Sucks site.
So I decided to check out another Leafs forum to see what they thought of Brodie, FA, and the draft.....and I just want to say how glad I am to be here and how much I love you guys... :-*Editor In Leaf by chance? AKA The Dubas Sucks site.
:-* (_!_)
Tanev for 4.5 over 4 to Calgary kind of undercuts the notion that this was an overpay.
Brodie isn't a big PK guy, looks as though he's a second unit guy.
Anyone think we could use another Ceci like PK guy? Weeger looks like a second unit guy as well.
New Post: I scouted TJ Brodie for TOR back in 2018. What I saw then is still there now. And it is good. https://t.co/38cQpAsQ9f
— Jack Han (@JhanHky) October 10, 2020
We have Lethonen for that.Quote
Can you describe that skill set and what makes it more sought after than what Brodie's?
A little more dangerous offensively, can QB a powerplay.
The more I think about it, the less wild I am about the idea of taking Kerfoot off the roster. He might be .5-1M higher than ideal, but he really played a good utility role.Yeah but the more I think about it the more that maybe we need a defensive forward in that 3C role. Kerfoot looks more like a winger than a C and it that's the case I think it makes some sense to get assets back. You've got to churn the roster and keep getting value back.
The more I think about it, the less wild I am about the idea of taking Kerfoot off the roster. He might be .5-1M higher than ideal, but he really played a good utility role.Yeah but the more I think about it the more that maybe we need a defensive forward in that 3C role. Kerfoot looks more like a winger than a C and it that's the case I think it makes some sense to get assets back. You've got to churn the roster and keep getting value back.
I would keep Kerfoot for one more year, keep him at 3rd C and not move him about like a chess piece, his possession numbers are very good. Trade Johnsson if need be and get Souperman and Dermott signed.I'm keeping Kerfoot if possible also. Johnsson can go. Nice player but we need the space.
Simmons actually gives Dubas praise on yesterday's signings, perhaps they can be friends after all and then goes on to say this bonehead remark: "And in fairness, the Leafs didn?t win all that much this past interrupted season". I guess they won enough to get into a playoff chance.
Leafs d core Lou left behind
— Noah Banks (@Noah_Banx) October 10, 2020
Rielly-Hainsy
Gardiner-Zaitsev
Dermott-Polak
19 million
Dubas D core
Rielly-Brodie
Muzzin-Holl
Dermott-Lehtonen
19 million
Is Lehtonen playing the right side in Finland right now?
Is Lehtonen playing the right side in Finland right now?
I believe he's playing on the left. Dubas said yesterday they expect Dermott to be the one to slide to the right side as well.
Good point.
I read that yesterday, and I'm not sure I'm convinced that Dermott can do that job well enough.
I have to think that having Dermott over there would be worst case scenario.
Good point.
I read that yesterday, and I'm not sure I'm convinced that Dermott can do that job well enough.
I have to think that having Dermott over there would be worst case scenario.
I'm not the biggest Dermott fan when it comes to his potential in becoming a top-4 defender but as a bottom pairing guy he should do very well regardless of the side he's playing on. And at like $1-1.25mil I'm not sure you're finding someone much better. I mean Borowiecki signed for $2mil.
Good point.
I read that yesterday, and I'm not sure I'm convinced that Dermott can do that job well enough.
I have to think that having Dermott over there would be worst case scenario.
I'm not the biggest Dermott fan when it comes to his potential in becoming a top-4 defender but as a bottom pairing guy he should do very well regardless of the side he's playing on. And at like $1-1.25mil I'm not sure you're finding someone much better. I mean Borowiecki signed for $2mil.
I'm hoping Liljegren has a camp.
I like Dermott's upside but I'm disappointed at his progress. I thought he'd be better by now but I guess the injury and him missing camp really messed up his year. I think it's too early to give up on him so we'll see how it goes this year. I don't see him getting over 1.5 per for 2 years.Good point.
I read that yesterday, and I'm not sure I'm convinced that Dermott can do that job well enough.
I have to think that having Dermott over there would be worst case scenario.
I'm not the biggest Dermott fan when it comes to his potential in becoming a top-4 defender but as a bottom pairing guy he should do very well regardless of the side he's playing on. And at like $1-1.25mil I'm not sure you're finding someone much better. I mean Borowiecki signed for $2mil.
Brodie, meanwhile, [played right defense] for the bulk of his time in Calgary, often on a first pairing with Mark Giordano. With Brodie at his side two seasons ago, Giordano, at 35, won his first Norris Trophy. He?d never finished higher than sixth before. And while Giordano was the driving force in the pair, Brodie?s quiet reliability allowed him to shine in much the same way that Hainsey (albeit to a lesser degree) helped Rielly the year he finished fifth in Norris voting (the same year Giordano won it).
Unlike Hainsey, who sunk when Rielly wasn?t out there, Brodie got along just fine without Giordano around.
Over about 472 minutes at five-on-five last year, the Flames had a 52 percent expected-goals clip when Brodie was on the ice without Giordano. According to PuckIQ, Calgary had about 53 percent possession in those instances (84 minutes) when Brodie faced ?elite? competition without Giordano (albeit with generous zone starts).
Translation: Brodie prefers to pass to forwards instead of taking long shots himselfNHL D, last 3 seasons combined EV-strength, 2000 min TOI = 169 names.
— Katya Knappe (@KatyaKnappe) October 12, 2020
Sort by iCF/60: T.J. Brodie is 125th.
Ahhhhhh, I like him more already.
Well, I'm glad advanced metrics cracked the unsolvable riddle of "Does the guy who scored 17 goals over three years shoot a lot?"
Well, I'm glad advanced metrics cracked the unsolvable riddle of "Does the guy who scored 17 goals over three years shoot a lot?"
That could very well be a matter of incompetence rather than volume ;D
Well, I'm glad advanced metrics cracked the unsolvable riddle of "Does the guy who scored 17 goals over three years shoot a lot?"
That could very well be a matter of incompetence rather than volume ;D
True. Someone should really start keeping track of how many shots these guys take.
Shots doesn't count blocks/misses though
Shots doesn't count blocks/misses though
For reals, I'd be interested in just to what extent the difference looks like between a list of "shots" and "shots + blocks/misses" for players.
Oooh, do Phaneuf!!Shots doesn't count blocks/misses though
For reals, I'd be interested in just to what extent the difference looks like between a list of "shots" and "shots + blocks/misses" for players.
Decided to test this quickly with one player, Barrie, because he seems to be an example of a player who might show a big gap in those stats. Among defenders who played at least 800 5-on-5 minutes last season Barrie ranked 12th in shots/60 and 5th in shots+blocks/misses/60.
Then since the window was open I noticed Rielly was 21st in shots/60 and 9th in shots+blocks/missed/60.
| Individual 5v5 per 60 | Barrie | Brodie | Rielly | Muzzin | Holl | Dermott | ||||||
| Attempts | 14.32 (5th) | 7.73 (129th) | 13.54 (9th) | 11.18 (49th) | 9.81 (78th) | 7.71 (130th) | ||||||
| Shots on goal | 6.67 (12th) | 2.91 (138th) | 6.29 (21st) | 5.77 (27th) | 4.6 (79th) | 4.2 (93rd) | ||||||
| xG | 0.24 (27th) | 0.12 (135th) | 0.24 (29th) | 0.21 (46th) | 0.21 (54th) | 0.14 (110th) | ||||||
| Goals | 0.19 (75th) | 0.16 (90th) | 0.14 (94th) | 0.37 (16th) | 0.06 (124th) | 0.28 (30th) | ||||||
| Individual 5v5 Counts | Barrie | Brodie | Rielly | Muzzin | Holl | Dermott | ||||||
| Attempts | 303 | 141 | 198 | 180 | 177 | 112 | ||||||
| Shots on goal | 141 | 53 | 92 | 93 | 83 | 61 | ||||||
| xG | 5.04 | 2.11 | 3.55 | 3.34 | 1.2 | 2.1 | ||||||
| Goals | 4 | 3 | 2 | 6 | 1 | 4 | ||||||
| Individual Sh% | Barrie | Brodie | Rielly | Muzzin | Holl | Dermott | ||||||
| Shots per attempt | 46.53% | 37.59% | 46.46% | 51.67% | 46.89% | 54.46% | ||||||
| Goals per attempt | 1.32% | 2.13% | 1.01% | 3.33% | 0.56% | 3.57% | ||||||
| Goals per shot (sh%) | 2.84% | 5.66% | 2.17% | 6.45% | 1.20% | 6.56% |
D TJ Brodie will wear jersey number 78 for the Toronto Maple Leafs. Number never worn before in team history. #LeafsForever pic.twitter.com/KVenNGaF5X
— NHL Jersey Numbers (@NHLNewNumbers) October 13, 2020
Wonder why Dom's model doesn't look at him very favourably. He looks fine but basically nothing more than a reliable 4 guy. Wonder if he just had a bit of a down year last year.
TJ Brodie desperately fills a need, but $5M could be a bit pricey in the final two years for the 30-year-old.https://t.co/foNQALGfjS pic.twitter.com/fFGtvrH5R8
— dom at the athletic (@domluszczyszyn) October 9, 2020
looks a little overvalued now because of the flat cap. 48% of being good value overall, probably one year too long pic.twitter.com/TrO8DSKpW1
— dom at the athletic (@domluszczyszyn) October 9, 2020
TJ Brodie, signed by TOR, is a top four left-handed two way defenceman who plays the right side and, yes, is good defensively. #LeafsForever pic.twitter.com/THzJJy9SKb
— JFresh (@JFreshHockey) October 9, 2020
Alex Pietrangelo, signed by VGK, is a Norris-calibre big minute #1 defenceman who's elite on the offensive side of the puck. #VegasBorn pic.twitter.com/6lz5LuPNS7
— JFresh (@JFreshHockey) October 12, 2020
Wonder why Dom's model doesn't look at him very favourably. He looks fine but basically nothing more than a reliable 4 guy. Wonder if he just had a bit of a down year last year.
If Rielly's play can get back to 2 years ago, we win, but this is on Rielly too. He needs to pick it up. The excuses are gone for him.He definitely had some health issues to start the season, when he came back to the Bubble, he looked way better than before the enforced layoff. Hope he stays healthy and benefits from a skilled defensive partner.
True but he needs to elevate his game regardless of partner. Let's hope he does.If Rielly's play can get back to 2 years ago, we win, but this is on Rielly too. He needs to pick it up. The excuses are gone for him.He definitely had some health issues to start the season, when he came back to the Bubble, he looked way better than before the enforced layoff. Hope he stays healthy and benefits from a skilled defensive partner.
I don't think expecting Rielly to be a 65-70 point a year defenseman tracks. Last year he was at a 47p/82g pace roughly what he was in 17-18.I'm not just talking points. His overall play was bad last year for his standards.
I think it's fair to expect him to be in the 50's, maybe even upper 50's. But he really wasn't far off from that last year so I'm not sure he needs any excuses.
I don't think expecting Rielly to be a 65-70 point a year defenseman tracks. Last year he was at a 47p/82g pace roughly what he was in 17-18.
I think it's fair to expect him to be in the 50's, maybe even upper 50's. But he really wasn't far off from that last year so I'm not sure he needs any excuses.
Do you mean you expect him to play Defense as well? Gosh, let me scratch my brow on this one! ;)True but he needs to elevate his game regardless of partner. Let's hope he does.If Rielly's play can get back to 2 years ago, we win, but this is on Rielly too. He needs to pick it up. The excuses are gone for him.He definitely had some health issues to start the season, when he came back to the Bubble, he looked way better than before the enforced layoff. Hope he stays healthy and benefits from a skilled defensive partner.
If Rielly's play can get back to 2 years ago, we win, but this is on Rielly too. He needs to pick it up. The excuses are gone for him.
Lots of Brodie clips and chartsAssessing TJ Brodie's fit with the Leafs https://t.co/sdAvURZTjH
— dylan (@dylanfremlin) December 3, 2020
Brodie also became known for, of all things, doing freestyle raps from time to time, and later, for a fascination with odd conspiracy theories. ?If there?s one thing we disagree on a lot, it?s his conspiracy theories,? Giordano said, chuckling.They go a lot into how good Brodie is, but this is where I got some whiplash.