Author Topic: Colorado Avalanche (C1) vs. Edmonton Oilers (P2)  (Read 1445 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Online CarltonTheBear

  • Administrator
  • Sittler Status
  • *****
  • Posts: 31549
    • View Profile
Colorado Avalanche (C1) vs. Edmonton Oilers (P2)
« on: May 30, 2022, 11:42:02 PM »

Offline RedLeaf

  • All Star
  • *****
  • Posts: 6310
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
Re: Colorado Avalanche (C1) vs. Edmonton Oilers (P2)
« Reply #1 on: May 31, 2022, 06:19:10 AM »
I have a hard time seeing the Oilers win one game in this series. But maybe McDavid and their current momentum gets them one win. Avalanche in 4 or 5.
"The saddest aspect of life right now is that science gathers knowledge faster than society gathers wisdom.." --Isaac Asimov.

Offline bustaheims

  • Sittler Status
  • ******
  • Posts: 23997
  • 56!
    • View Profile
Re: Colorado Avalanche (C1) vs. Edmonton Oilers (P2)
« Reply #2 on: May 31, 2022, 12:08:54 PM »
Avs in, I dunno, 6 I guess?
"Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts." - Daniel Patrick Moynihan

Online louisstamos

  • Veteran
  • ****
  • Posts: 1985
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
    • Diamond Weapon
Re: Colorado Avalanche (C1) vs. Edmonton Oilers (P2)
« Reply #3 on: May 31, 2022, 09:03:11 PM »
I have no idea how that was considered onside...

Offline L K

  • Sittler Status
  • ******
  • Posts: 15001
    • View Profile
Re: Colorado Avalanche (C1) vs. Edmonton Oilers (P2)
« Reply #4 on: May 31, 2022, 09:40:07 PM »
Avs in 3

Offline Guilt Trip

  • Sittler Status
  • ******
  • Posts: 11322
    • View Profile
Re: Colorado Avalanche (C1) vs. Edmonton Oilers (P2)
« Reply #5 on: May 31, 2022, 10:21:13 PM »
I have no idea how that was considered onside...
Makar put the picking the zone but never entered, or touched the puck inside the zone until Nuke cleared. Good call.

Offline Bender

  • All Star
  • *****
  • Posts: 9579
  • Gender: Male
  • Bender cracked corn and he is great!
    • View Profile
Re: Colorado Avalanche (C1) vs. Edmonton Oilers (P2)
« Reply #6 on: May 31, 2022, 10:49:28 PM »
I've only watched 10minutes and this is a horribly officiated game.
"They say you can judge a man by the company he keeps. So here is the professor's oldest friend, a grotesque, stinking lobster." - Bender

Offline RedLeaf

  • All Star
  • *****
  • Posts: 6310
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
Re: Colorado Avalanche (C1) vs. Edmonton Oilers (P2)
« Reply #7 on: May 31, 2022, 11:13:14 PM »
Avs in 3

Starting now you mean? Lol
"The saddest aspect of life right now is that science gathers knowledge faster than society gathers wisdom.." --Isaac Asimov.

Offline Guilt Trip

  • Sittler Status
  • ******
  • Posts: 11322
    • View Profile
Re: Colorado Avalanche (C1) vs. Edmonton Oilers (P2)
« Reply #8 on: May 31, 2022, 11:55:09 PM »
If TBay gets past NYR and if either of these teams play like they did tonight, they'll 3 peat easily.

Offline Heroic Shrimp

  • All Star
  • *****
  • Posts: 5088
    • View Profile
Re: Colorado Avalanche (C1) vs. Edmonton Oilers (P2)
« Reply #9 on: June 01, 2022, 09:23:25 AM »
Supersize my Freedom Fries

Offline Derk

  • Veteran
  • ****
  • Posts: 3079
    • View Profile
Re: Colorado Avalanche (C1) vs. Edmonton Oilers (P2)
« Reply #10 on: June 01, 2022, 06:22:19 PM »
I have no idea how that was considered onside...
Makar put the picking the zone but never entered, or touched the puck inside the zone until Nuke cleared. Good call.

Wow. Using the ol' delayed offside rule because he didn't have possession of the puck when crossing the blue line before his teammate got out of the zone. Nice. Well, not so much for the Oilers.

Offline Nik

  • Sittler Status
  • ******
  • Posts: 29451
  • Jerk Emeritus
    • View Profile
Re: Colorado Avalanche (C1) vs. Edmonton Oilers (P2)
« Reply #11 on: June 01, 2022, 09:07:18 PM »

I feel like that goal sort of neatly puts together the fundamental debate about sports officiating in a nutshell. Nobody is seriously arguing that what Makar did violated the notion of what the Offsides rule is supposed to prevent, just maybe that it was possibly mis-timed by a fraction of a second that gave his team no real advantage but may have violated a strict interpretation of the rule as written.

Which, like I said, seems like the issue with officiating in general. When it's called against our team, we want the Refs to use common sense and discretion and take situation into account. When it's called against the other guys we're all strict orginalists.
I wish to hell I’d never said "Winning isn’t everything it’s the only thing". What I believe is, if you go out on a football field, or any endeavour in life, and you leave every fibre of what you have on the field, then you’ve won.
- Vince Lombardi

Offline OldTimeHockey

  • Veteran
  • ****
  • Posts: 3757
    • View Profile
Re: Colorado Avalanche (C1) vs. Edmonton Oilers (P2)
« Reply #12 on: June 01, 2022, 09:26:26 PM »

I feel like that goal sort of neatly puts together the fundamental debate about sports officiating in a nutshell. Nobody is seriously arguing that what Makar did violated the notion of what the Offsides rule is supposed to prevent, just maybe that it was possibly mis-timed by a fraction of a second that gave his team no real advantage but may have violated a strict interpretation of the rule as written.

Which, like I said, seems like the issue with officiating in general. When it's called against our team, we want the Refs to use common sense and discretion and take situation into account. When it's called against the other guys we're all strict orginalists.

There's a difference between happening to not have the puck on your stick for a split second while the player leaves the zone (coincidentally), and standing at the blueline and not touching the puck while you observe your players leaving the zone.

Did the player leaving the zone have any consequence on the play? Well yes and no. Did that player contribute to the goal. No. Could the offside call have changed the course of the entire game? Most definitely.
To me, offsides are not a grey zone. Either you're offside or you're not. That player was offside no matter how many comparables Elliot Friedman shows to justify it.

Offline Nik

  • Sittler Status
  • ******
  • Posts: 29451
  • Jerk Emeritus
    • View Profile
Re: Colorado Avalanche (C1) vs. Edmonton Oilers (P2)
« Reply #13 on: June 01, 2022, 09:30:59 PM »
To me, offsides are not a grey zone.

And, likewise, Brett Hull's skate was 100% in the crease.

My point wasn't that the technical definition for offsides allows for a grey zone, but rather that I just personally don't care much.
I wish to hell I’d never said "Winning isn’t everything it’s the only thing". What I believe is, if you go out on a football field, or any endeavour in life, and you leave every fibre of what you have on the field, then you’ve won.
- Vince Lombardi

Offline OldTimeHockey

  • Veteran
  • ****
  • Posts: 3757
    • View Profile
Re: Colorado Avalanche (C1) vs. Edmonton Oilers (P2)
« Reply #14 on: June 01, 2022, 09:42:49 PM »
To me, offsides are not a grey zone.

And, likewise, Brett Hull's skate was 100% in the crease.

My point wasn't that the technical definition for offsides allows for a grey zone, but rather that I just personally don't care much.

I don't care much either. I'd rather Colorado wins the series, but really, I have nothing vested in it.

A call like that is going to have players lifting their stick every time they enter the zone just incase the player skating out hasn't cleared yet. That's silly.