So here's a question based on this thread. Imagine if before the game for some reason you found out the score. Magic Genie, Psychic Powers, Some sort of Back to the Future II-esque obtained future sports book...whatever. You just 100% knew the score would be 4-2 and there weren't any empty netters scored.
Most of us, I think, would be disappointed but see it as a reasonable outcome. The Flames are hot, the Leafs are on the road...a winnable game but also a loseable one and while beaten, the score certainly doesn't indicate that they embarrassed themselves.
So given that, what distribution of goals would somehow be least likely to be commented on as being indicative of "what the Leafs always do" or something as being fundamentally indicative of their lack of character or work ethic as opposed to just the reality that sometimes teams lose games and the Maple Leafs, who aren't a great team, will lose them with some frequency.
Is it the Flames getting their goals in the first? Or is that a showing of how the Leafs can't get off to a good start. Is it the teams trading goals over two periods before giving up a couple in the third or is that just a lesser example of how they "forget to play hockey in the third".
Is it the Flames scoring two, the Leafs roaring back to tie it only for the Flames to get two more? Or is that the worst of both worlds with a bad start and finish?