cw said:
Couple that with what he did in the NHL and what he did to grow the game of hockey off the ice with his Beliveau-like demeanor and he's a lock for the HHoF. It's just a question of when.
That's probably true and it's also probably true that I shouldn't care too much about someone getting in in their first year of eligibility but if Sundin doesn't get in that first year I really do think it would speak poorly to the voters(not that we need more evidence of that but still)
Compare Sundin to Shanahan, someone who I don't think anyone would argue with in terms of a no-doubter hall of famer, and I think that becomes clear. Sundin's career PPG is 1.002. Shanahan's is .888. Of course, people will say that Shanahan will be going in for his post season accomplishments, right? Sundin's career playoff PPG is .902 while Shanahan's was .728(It's worth specifically mentioning that Sundin's playoff scoring rate beats Shanahan's regular season numbers). Context? Shanahan not only played his career with better linemates but also played more of his career before the advent of the deadpuck era.
So, I mean, if Shanahan is a no-brainer and Sundin isn't, what's really being said? Yes, Shanahan won three cups. But he did so as the, at best, 3rd best forward on those teams and 4th best player. I know the Hall has already made their feelings clear on this with Fuhr and Glenn Anderson but it really shouldn't be the Hall of Guys with Great Teammates.