bustaheims
Well-known member
https://twitter.com/friedgehnic/status/1630699625211363333
Have to imagine Nashville flips Barrie
Have to imagine Nashville flips Barrie
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Guilt Trip said:Good haul for Nash. Essentially 2 1sts and whatever they can get for Barrie if they flip him.
Probably not but Edm needs help on the backend. They still need another D man.Bender said:Guilt Trip said:Good haul for Nash. Essentially 2 1sts and whatever they can get for Barrie if they flip him.
Was gonna say, I understand this trade but I wonder if Ekholm's contract ages well...
bustaheims said:https://twitter.com/pierrevlebrun/status/1630701678679695376
Lol
Zee said:bustaheims said:https://twitter.com/pierrevlebrun/status/1630701678679695376
Lol
I wonder if Poile laughed too
cw said:Zee said:bustaheims said:https://twitter.com/pierrevlebrun/status/1630701678679695376
Lol
I wonder if Poile laughed too
I was wondering if Dubas should have got Chicago to eat a few bucks of Lafferty's deal. It would have given him more options at less dollars to get under the cap with Murray's return.
If you see something silly like 4%, I'd argue the GM or his capologist are just doing their job -doing something that might save them dumping a better player to get under the cap.
Zee said:cw said:Zee said:bustaheims said:https://twitter.com/pierrevlebrun/status/1630701678679695376
Lol
I wonder if Poile laughed too
I was wondering if Dubas should have got Chicago to eat a few bucks of Lafferty's deal. It would have given him more options at less dollars to get under the cap with Murray's return.
If you see something silly like 4%, I'd argue the GM or his capologist are just doing their job -doing something that might save them dumping a better player to get under the cap.
I mean it only equates to 250k off the cap hit, which isn't significant at all.
cw said:I was wondering if Dubas should have got Chicago to eat a few bucks of Lafferty's deal. It would have given him more options at less dollars to get under the cap with Murray's return.
CarltonTheBear said:cw said:I was wondering if Dubas should have got Chicago to eat a few bucks of Lafferty's deal. It would have given him more options at less dollars to get under the cap with Murray's return.
Problem is a team can only retain on 3 contracts. They'll be retaining on Kane. They were already retaining on McCabe (for 2 more years, which is fairly rare). So retaining on Lafferty, which would have had to count this season and next season, would limit their options both this deadline and possibly next deadline.