Nik the Trik said:
One of the things that I think is interesting about the whole Karlsson thing is that we still haven't seen a team win a cup that was primarily built after the 2012 lockout. The teams that have won cups since then were teams that added pieces and re-shaped rosters in the new environment then but chiefly it's been Chicago winning around Kane and Toews and Pittsburgh winning around Crosby and Malkin.
So on the one hand you hesitate to say Ottawa couldn't build themselves into a contender around Karlsson but on the other...I don't know what that team would look like. if they're perpetually going to be in tight against the cap does rebuilding even make sense if in order for it to work you have to hit a lottery or two and then win immediately before extensions kick in? Is that any sounder a plan than just tinkering with what they have and hope they get lucky?
Truth is I don't think anyone knows. I don't know there are meaningful lessons in repeatable team building beyond "Let's make the playoffs and roll the dice" anymore.
Yeah, I'm with Nik on this.
Ever since guys started getting big bucks right out of their ELC, the window of building a championship team with guys on undervalued contracts seems to be pretty short.
The only guy left undervalued in Chicago is that old back-diving deal that Keith is on at $5.5m. And of course, Pittsburgh has Crosby at $8.7m.
I think that's why some have suggested the Leafs go after it before Matthews and Marner get paid...Nylander is inevitable right now, but isn't exactly setting himself up for a big payday for his ndext deal, yet.