Search results

There's Nik in a nutshell. Someone dares to question his logic and he jumps up on the box and throws a personal attack for good measure. Wonder if the mods are ever going to deal with you are are the site owners happy with 20 members from the League's largest fanbase?

I think I have written several times that I think the Officer should be charged. But expecting him to shoot an armed murder who isn't threatening anyone when Officer gets there 8s a bad comparison

To the Officer

Careful getting down from your soapbox. The Officer should be charged but that does not mean he should have shot the White guy to be equal, the situations aren't.

I have seen no evidence that the White person posed any threat so only considering only Race is not a valid comparison. The Officer should be charged

It certainly does not but when you resist you greatly increase the chances of the situation going the sideways. The comparison does not work

Did he resist? Officer should still be charged but looking for a comparison might be a wasted effort

The Blake shooting was wrong and should lead to charges but Blake could have easily prevented it. That still does not excuse the Officer's actions. You would think after hundreds of incidents it would be abundantly clear that the possibility of bad things happening when you resist arrest greatly...

And making a huge generalization that just isn't true whole helping nothing.

I wrote in response to Herman's words questioning them alone.

I don't recall reading "violent nationalist dogma" in the post I replied to? The vast majority of people on the Right in the US do not believe in those things.

I'm not on the Right or Republucan side but thinking its as simple as this is where X leads might have someone suggest Socialist policy leads to Venezuela.  Its best to just consider that because someone does not share your thoughts or political beliefs it does not make them them the devil.

Nailed it except for those 11 MLB games that are either finished or still playing right now,

Bender said they did not elect a leader that would win him to their side.  I simply replied that from my reading that would require them to go from the right to the left and i don't see how that makes sense? Why would they cross over the threshold and compete for voters when they don't have that...

But if they go the other direction how would that not equally alienate a lot of their voters? They had the most party votes last time around.

I doubt the Progressive in Progressive Conservative has that meaning. It's highly doubtful that person will lead the party in the near future. The person you are looking for is either Liberal, NDP, or Green. 

My post was for one poster, who I have read many times. No Conservative would interest him.

Let's be real, their only chance at winning you was picking a non conservative as Leader.

These things can't be correct, Damien Cox has informed me this was a bad trade.

Dudas seemed to allude to the possibility that he would not be using this pick when he spoke today. Guessing he has more irons in the fire.