Quick links:  Login  |  Sign up  |  Site Rules  |  Support TMLfans

Kyle Dubas: Keep or Move?

Started by Arn, May 14, 2023, 06:58:16 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Arn

So, keep or move on?

I'm 100% for retaining him. But as Kloke says, he probably needs to continue to evolve and be a bit more cut throat, likely starting with replacing Keefe and moving players he maybe didn't want to

https://theathletic.com/4517458/2023/05/14/kyle-dubas-maple-leafs-gm-future/
I Saw Jay McClement Score.

Dappleganger

#1
Quote from: Arn on May 14, 2023, 06:58:16 AMSo, keep or move on?

I'm 100% for retaining him. But as Kloke says, he probably needs to continue to evolve and be a bit more cut throat, likely starting with replacing Keefe and moving players he maybe didn't want to

https://theathletic.com/4517458/2023/05/14/kyle-dubas-maple-leafs-gm-future/

This entirely depends on how certain players feel about Dubas, but I'd keep Dubas and let Shanahan and Keefe go.

I can't really fault Dubas for the job he's done.


Bill_Berg_is_less_sad

I think that cutthroat stuff will come naturally if he re-signs. He promised this group he'd keep them together, all bets are off now though. Things are going to change one way or another.

I am also increasingly fearful that Matthews will bolt after next year. I wonder if he'll have any influence on the Dubas decision, one way it the other.

L K

Simple for me:

Kyle, who are you trading?

If he has a clear answer to change the roster I do everything to bring him back.  The person who has a solution to the roster design is the guy who should get the job 

Nik


I'm not fussed either way. I think he's a pretty good GM but if he left I think a pretty good GM should be the minimum expectation for what the club, with its resources, should be able to find. For continuity's sake I'd probably lean towards keeping him but, like, honestly if I were Shanahan I might get in touch with Matthews' people and see what would make him more likely to extend. Signing him really should be the priority.
I wish to hell I'd never said "Winning isn't everything it's the only thing". What I believe is, if you go out on a football field, or any endeavour in life, and you leave every fibre of what you have on the field, then you've won.
- Vince Lombardi

Zee

Meh, who knows. We've done this dance 56 years, I'll still be here even if Craig Button is the new GM

Dappleganger

Quote from: Zee on May 14, 2023, 10:39:14 AMMeh, who knows. We've done this dance 56 years, I'll still be here even if Craig Button is the new GM

Is Button interested? 😂

Highlander

"In the beginners mind there are many possibilities, but in the expert's there are few"
                                           Sunryn Suzuki

Guilt Trip

Quote from: L K on May 14, 2023, 09:52:55 AMSimple for me:

Kyle, who are you trading?

If he has a clear answer to change the roster I do everything to bring him back.  The person who has a solution to the roster design is the guy who should get the job 
There's no clear answer though because you don't know what the market is. There's no way you're giving any of these guys away. Same goes for a guy with the solution. There isn't one. This team could be constructed exactly the same and next year have totally different results. There's such a fine line between winning and losing. A post here or there makes all the difference. Same goes for a missed call or a bad call.
The Leafs need to find out what Matthews is thinking. That's the priority right now. If he's hesitant or whatever, you move him. If he's committed to the team you sign him and then deal with Willy and see what he's thinking. There's no need to reinvent the wheel here.

Bill33

Quote from: Guilt Trip on May 14, 2023, 01:04:39 PMThe Leafs need to find out what Matthews is thinking. That's the priority right now.

I think equivalent to that, is to go to Tavares, tell him that they're moving the C to Matthews, and ask him to waive his NTC. It's not impossible that he wouldn't, given many precedents, and that would allow for a huge reallocation cap space. This is the most obvious solution, but it seems like a taboo subject for some reason. Maybe it's the pajamas.

So maybe a smart GM would go in that direction before trading a Hart winner, a Selke finalist that leads the team in points every year, and a 40g scorer on a team friendly deal for a can of beans, that is.

CarltonTheBear

#10
Quote from: Bill33 on May 14, 2023, 01:38:58 PMI think equivalent to that, is to go to Tavares, tell him that they're moving the C to Matthews, and ask him to waive his NTC. It's not impossible that he wouldn't, given many precedents, and that would allow for a huge reallocation cap space. This is the most obvious solution, but it seems like a taboo subject for some reason. Maybe it's the pajamas.

I think tying the captaincy to a July 1st extension to Matthews is probably necessary, and presumably always somewhat part of the long-term plan all along. I don't see Tavares going anywhere though. He got his NMC fair and square and deserves to use it as he sees fit. I will say though I think a big part of the offseason plan this season should be to make sure Tavares doesn't need to play another game at centre. Tampa did it with Stamkos, Leafs can do it with him.

And barring a trade of a core player having a new person lining up at 2C for the first time in 6 years could represent the major change to the line-up the team maybe needs.

Rob

I don't think anyone is taking Tavares for two more years at $11m per unless the Leaf retains salary or give up more assets.  I don't really think Tavares is a problem but a move to the wing would probably do him good.

Tavares at 32 is still a point per game player.  He's the ultimate professional and someone you want around the team. He just scored a massive goal for this team, a goal that put them into the second round.  Something Matthews, Marner or Nylander couldn't do. 

So pajamas or not, Tavares did nothing wrong to warrant having the captaincy taken away, or to be asked to waive his NMC.   

AtomicMapleLeaf

Keep them all, I don't want them going into the abyss of miss management that was shitty for the last 50 plus years.   

CarltonTheBear

Quote from: Rob on May 14, 2023, 02:13:19 PMI don't think anyone is taking Tavares for two more years at $11m per unless the Leaf retains salary or give up more assets.  I don't really think Tavares is a problem but a move to the wing would probably do him good.

Tavares at 32 is still a point per game player.  He's the ultimate professional and someone you want around the team. He just scored a massive goal for this team, a goal that put them into the second round.  Something Matthews, Marner or Nylander couldn't do. 

So pajamas or not, Tavares did nothing wrong to warrant having the captaincy taken away, or to be asked to waive his NMC.   

It's not entirely because Tavares did something wrong (although yeah if the Leafs say won a Cup with Tavares maybe the conversation isn't coming up right now) and more that I can't imagine there wasn't always some sort of idea for the C to eventually get passed to Matthews. The signing of a possible 8-year extension which likely signifies his commitment to the team for the rest of his career just feels like the right time to do it.

Arn

If I was making a range of moves, I think I would like to see something like

Dubas stays on.

Matthews signs that new contract, and yeah, probably takes on the C as part of it.

Tavares transitions to play wing, O'Rielly gets a new deal. I'd bring Schenn back too.

The "core" is re-jigged by something like Nylander and Brodie for someone the calibre of Makar or Josi or McAvoy or Hughes or something.

And try and see what you can do to cast off Murray.

So you end up with something like

xxxx-Matthews-xxxx
Tavares-xxxx-Marner
xxxx-ROR-xxxx
xxxx-xxxx-xxxx

New stud D-xxxx
Rielly-xxxx
Schenn-xxxx

Samsonov
Woll

As your core, so it's distributed slightly differently.


That's nothing against Nylander (or Brodie), it's just that trading someone probably comes under the ruthless decision that needs to be made and he's kind of the vulnerable one.
I Saw Jay McClement Score.