Quick links: Login | Sign up | Site Rules | Support TMLfans
Started by Peter D., January 16, 2015, 08:46:44 AM
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: Peter D. on January 16, 2015, 08:46:44 AM...who do they pursue to coach this team?Much has been made about waiting upon Babcock's availability. And if not him, then maybe a McLellan if fired by San Jose, or Paul MacLean, maybe Pete DeBoer, etc.In the case of Babcock, unless the Leafs offered him something like a 10-year, $40 million deal to see a true rebuild through from beginning to end, would he really want to come here when the team is years away from contention (not like this current team is any closer)?So who would be good candidates to set a rebuild in motion by developing players properly? Would Jeff Blashill from Detroit's minor team fit the bill? I would have suggested Dallas Eakins had he still been with the Marlies and continued to show success in developing the players. But that ship has sailed. Which way would you pursue it?
Quote from: bustaheims on January 16, 2015, 11:32:03 AMIf they do just blow things up (which I don't think they will and I'm not convinced they need to), they might as well just stick with Horachek until they're further down the line.
Quote from: gunnar36 on January 16, 2015, 12:13:26 PMQuote from: bustaheims on January 16, 2015, 11:32:03 AMIf they do just blow things up (which I don't think they will and I'm not convinced they need to), they might as well just stick with Horachek until they're further down the line.I absolutely agree here. All this talk about Babcock, but there is no guarantee that he will be able to get any better results out of this team then Horachek or even Carlyle for that matter. Babcock has been given great teams to coach and has achieved great results with those groups... scouting and GM in Detroit is leaps and bounds ahead of ours.Knowing our luck we would throw a huge 7 yr contract Babcock's way and it will turn out looking like a Clarkson contract.
QuoteFull Q&A LinkQ: It's easy to say you have to have good players, but by staying on top, they're harder to find. Without quality scouting, would you have unearthed draft gems like Henrik Zetterberg (210th overall in 1999) or Pavel Datsyuk (171st in 1998)?Holland: You can't just live on the first round. We haven't had a top-10 pick since 1991 (Martin Lapointe, 10th overall). Identifying players in scouting and having instincts and having some luck and a philosophy in drafting and building through the draft has been significant, but I also think just as important is player development.That's where (player development coach) Jiri Fischer has become very important for us. He's the person that for 2-3 years the young players whose rights we own get to know and get some direction and guidance from. Then you go to the American Hockey League and I look at the job that (Grand Rapids coach) Jeff Blashill has done the past couple of years. Last season, from the Olympic break on, we didn't have Pav (Datsyuk), we didn't have Z (Zetterberg) and we were still able to play our way into the playoffs thanks to the way our younger players contributed in the second half of the year when we had adversity with our injuries.Q: You mentioned having a philosophy and clearly the Red Wings' philosophy is patience. No player will play in Detroit before his time.Holland: I don't believe you hand anyone a job. Just because you're a good junior that doesn't mean you're going to be a good pro. This is another league. This is another step up, so I think it's important that the young kids understand that it's a competition and that they've got to take someone's job.For me, it's a respect for how good these players are. To play in the NHL, this is the best 650 players in the world. So to think that some 21, 22-year-old player that you drafted in the second or third round that's had a good junior career, that they're all of a sudden going to really step up and make a statement, I have too much respect for how hard the league is. That's why I think it's important that you put in time playing in the American Hockey League and you learn how to be a pro. And then you come up here.If we had the first pick in the draft, I probably would put the guy right on the team. Because we haven't had a top-10 pick since 1991, the players that we've drafted, there's a whole different mindset to get them from the draft table to where they help us. We're trying to win in the NHL. I can put a bunch of young players in the NHL, but the standard we've set here is we're a playoff team and we're trying to compete with the best teams in our division, the best teams in our conference and obviously it's been a pretty good run for a long time, but it's getting harder all the time, because we haven't picked that high and these other organizations are starting to evolve.
Quote from: herman on January 16, 2015, 09:56:40 PMIt's one of the reasons why Edmonton is failing even with so many high picks.
Page created in 0.051 seconds with 22 queries.