Scriven to fly. Scriven the dog a bone. Scriven it up.Good deal, not much to complain about with it that I can see. Seems fair.
The Leafs have less than $2.5 million committed to goalies next year. That could be a stroke of genius by Burke, or the final line of Burke's resume in Toronto.
What does Scrivens' contract pay him at the AHL level? I read that he made $85,000 last season but his performance should have earned him a raise.
Quote from: caveman on September 13, 2012, 08:49:35 AMWhat does Scrivens' contract pay him at the AHL level? I read that he made $85,000 last season but his performance should have earned him a raise.He was bumped up to $105k.
Quote from: Peter D. on September 13, 2012, 12:20:10 PMThe Leafs have less than $2.5 million committed to goalies next year. That could be a stroke of genius by Burke, or the final line of Burke's resume in Toronto. A lot of the advanced stats guys I follow on Twitter claim you shouldn't be spending much on goaltenders due to their unpredictability. Maybe we'll come out on the right side of it for once.
Quote from: Potvin29 on September 13, 2012, 06:54:20 PMQuote from: Peter D. on September 13, 2012, 12:20:10 PMThe Leafs have less than $2.5 million committed to goalies next year. That could be a stroke of genius by Burke, or the final line of Burke's resume in Toronto. A lot of the advanced stats guys I follow on Twitter claim you shouldn't be spending much on goaltenders due to their unpredictability. Maybe we'll come out on the right side of it for once.I think a more judicious analysis would claim you shouldn't overspend on goalies. You have to put up decent money to get a decent goalie (obviously). And, when you get hold of a Lundqvist or a Brodeur, you pay them very well. The goalie is the most important member of the team, after all.
Quote from: Zanzibar Buck-Buck McFate on September 14, 2012, 01:24:29 PMQuote from: Potvin29 on September 13, 2012, 06:54:20 PMQuote from: Peter D. on September 13, 2012, 12:20:10 PMThe Leafs have less than $2.5 million committed to goalies next year. That could be a stroke of genius by Burke, or the final line of Burke's resume in Toronto. A lot of the advanced stats guys I follow on Twitter claim you shouldn't be spending much on goaltenders due to their unpredictability. Maybe we'll come out on the right side of it for once.I think a more judicious analysis would claim you shouldn't overspend on goalies. You have to put up decent money to get a decent goalie (obviously). And, when you get hold of a Lundqvist or a Brodeur, you pay them very well. The goalie is the most important member of the team, after all.Potvin correctly summarized the consensus thinking of most of the advanced stats guys. Most would say that given the choice of signing one of the top 15 guys in the league and paying current market value for that (5-6million) or signing one of the guys in the 15-30 group, you should sign one of the guys in the 15-30 group and use the extra cash to buy better skaters. Goalies are hard to predict and the deltas between them are getting smaller so the fact of the matter is that when you get a top 15 guy, you usually overspend relative to his improvement in team success.
Potvin correctly summarized the consensus thinking of most of the advanced stats guys. Most would say that given the choice of signing one of the top 15 guys in the league and paying current market value for that (5-6million) or signing one of the guys in the 15-30 group, you should sign one of the guys in the 15-30 group and use the extra cash to buy better skaters. Goalies are hard to predict and the deltas between them are getting smaller so the fact of the matter is that when you get a top 15 guy, you usually overspend relative to his improvement in team success.
Quote from: princedpw on September 15, 2012, 10:33:02 AMPotvin correctly summarized the consensus thinking of most of the advanced stats guys. Most would say that given the choice of signing one of the top 15 guys in the league and paying current market value for that (5-6million) or signing one of the guys in the 15-30 group, you should sign one of the guys in the 15-30 group and use the extra cash to buy better skaters. Goalies are hard to predict and the deltas between them are getting smaller so the fact of the matter is that when you get a top 15 guy, you usually overspend relative to his improvement in team success.Where that kind of falls apart is when you look at post season success - the overwhelming majority of Stanley Cup champs have a goalie who would easily be considered a top 15 goalie and a significant portion had goalies who were Vezina winners/finalists.
and two seasons ago LA's goalie was a top 15? or at the start of last season did he have that rating.